Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree, Dan. If you have to view my print with a loupe, then I have failed as a photographer. The whole point of my photography is communication. If you can't understand what I am communicating from a 3x5 print or a reproduction in a magazine or a website as well as you can from a 16x20 silver gelatin print, then my photograph is a failure. Leically, Tina At 09:09 PM 7/17/00 -0400, you wrote: >I do not allow people to view my photographs with loupes. I consider it a >personal insult when they do. > >Dan C. > >At 12:21 AM 18-07-00 +0200, Erwin Puts wrote: > >Today I was in Solms and they showed me some prints from a very professiona > >photographer who works on Velvia and K64. Prints were made from scanned > >negatives and digitally printed with 152 lpmm and with an intelligent > >procedure of rasterization. The quality is beyond what you can get with > >Epson printers as a generic class. The print size was A4. They looked > >beautiful, sharp, saturated colours etc, whatever you would like. The eye > >ccould not ask for more and indeed, as I said in my previous post, the limit > >of the eye's resolving power has been reached. Now I used my 10 x loupe and > >I did not see ANY detail, Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com