Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:32:06 -0700
References: <4.2.2.20000629183453.00bc67d0@infoave.net> <005b01bfe289$c1730200$131110ac@zoomtel.com> <395CAB2D.2771EADA@home.com> <000d01bfe2a4$bfaf16a0$131110ac@zoomtel.com>

Craig Roberts wrote:
> 
> Ted scolded: "You should be so lucky me old son to have her talent,
> personality and miles traveled on assignments!"
> 
> Believe me, sir.  I am well aware of Tina's formidable talents and I'm a
> great admirer (in fact, I've archived her Web site on my hard drive).  My
> remarks were meant as sarcastic self-deprecation.
> 
> For that matter, you've got quite an enviable reputation, too.  Will you be
> at the Leica Workshop on Cape Cod this September?  If so, I'd like to meet
> you.<<<<<<<<

Hi Craig,
Explanation accepted and apology presented for my jumping quickly.  Part
of being an old gentleman who was taught to jump to defend a lady and a friend.

Yes I'll be doing my usual Leica Seminar on Cape Cad and shaking your
hand would indeed be a pleasure, as I always enjoy the warm hand shake
of a LUG and LEG member.  Look forward to it.

kindest regards,
ted

In reply to: Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)