Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.
From: "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:06:17 -0400
References: <4.2.2.20000629183453.00bc67d0@infoave.net> <005b01bfe289$c1730200$131110ac@zoomtel.com> <395CAB2D.2771EADA@home.com>

Ted scolded: "You should be so lucky me old son to have her talent,
personality and miles traveled on assignments!"



Believe me, sir.  I am well aware of Tina's formidable talents and I'm a
great admirer (in fact, I've archived her Web site on my hard drive).  My
remarks were meant as sarcastic self-deprecation.

For that matter, you've got quite an enviable reputation, too.  Will you be
at the Leica Workshop on Cape Cod this September?  If so, I'd like to meet
you.

Craig
Boston

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)
In reply to: Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)