Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....
From: "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 21:23:15 -0500
References: <B5781615.68C1%jbcollier@home.com>

John,
I'm surprised to hear this.   So far as I know, the M4 was nearly as good as
the M2/M3 (maybe the equal).   I suppose only someone like DAG or Sherry can
say for certain how these cameras hold up but my discussions with one of
them indicates that the M2/3/4 were the cream of the crop.
Bud

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....


[Snip]
>The M4
> is too desirable to collectors and needs more regular maintenance (Under
> heavy shooting) than a well sorted late M4-2 or -P.
>
> John Collier
>
>

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@home.com> (Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other way round....)