Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: B & H Photo & Calumet
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:17:35 -0700
References: <p04320406b576adfb5f98@[209.186.58.97]> <395114BA.6927D9B7@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <39511845.BA0A35AC@cyberhighway.net>

Bill Satterfield wrote:
> 
> I found Calumet to be higher than B&H. May be I am missing something.
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
You think the prices are higher because of the color images on the glossy paper.
When you compare against the bleached newsprint of the B&H you find a direct
down to the penny match.
That's why they call everything "So&So Warehouse". You think it's cheap cause
the atmosphere is so cheap.
Mark Rabiner

In reply to: Message from Larry Kopitnik <kopitnil@marketingcomm.com> ([Leica] Re: B & H Photo & Calumet)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: B & H Photo & Calumet)
Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: B & H Photo & Calumet)