Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Okay, I've now spent a couple of days with a DR Summicron (thanks to Ting!), and I have a few thoughts. While I've never been impressed by the argument that holds the M3, M2 and M4 to be superior mechanically to the later bodies -- I've worked with both types, and my M4-P is just as nice, in every way -- I am now utterly convinced of the the superior build quality of the early lenses. Later, horrendously expensive Leica lenses, though reasonably well-constructed, feel about as solid as my old Zuikos, and less solid than the fully metal lenses for the Contax SLR. Frankly, the new black Voigtlanders feel better (although I'm less happy with the finish on the chrome versions). This DR Summicron, on the other hand, is about as well made as anything I've ever held in my hands. It's a joy. I'm determined, now, to buy only the earlier lenses, unless the optical performance of the recent versions are vastly superior. Call it a fetish thing. So. I'm still searching for that perfect 35mm lens. How is that old chrome Summicron, relative to the fourth generation? And what about the 35/2.8 Summaron? Doug Cooper (oh, and thanks for the response re: my IIIc.)