Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John Coan wrote: > > Agree that a Rolleiflex is far from a klunker. I have a 2.8E and find it > pretty fast if you use the sports finder and little mirror/magnifier. I ><Snip> > They also make great "stealth" cameras, despite their size. People see > them and think you're playing around with a quaint antique and isn't that > cute. The shutter is quieter than an M too. And the number one trick of > all -- turn the body 90 degrees and look down while framing, focusing, and > shooting to the side. It's easy to pretend you are messing with the > controls or some other such diversion. > > I would like to try out one of those Speed Graphics some time.... with one > of those huge flash bulb reflectors. > ><Snip> I never got many shots with My speed graphic my 127 Ektar is put together wrong perhaps by me when I put it back together again once I'm going to take another look at it. My 2.8 F Rolleiflex I got 20 years ago with that darn prism and pistol grip. When I finally got a regular pop up finder with the sports finder and little mirror/magnifier that camera became much more useful to me. Much lighter and less top heavy and I brace it against my side after fine focusing to shoot from the hip(or tummy). Quieter than a Leica I hate to say yet another time. But if you smashed someone in the head with it it might break and you cant then just wip out a screwdriver and fix it. And the negs are only two and a quarter square. What can you do with those little things! Cant' tap dance on them! Mark :-) Rabiner