Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can relate to this right now. Normally I process all my negative film (whether C41 or B&W) myself. The other day I had a roll of Fuji 800 to develop and because my Jobo was not yet set up after moving it to Switzerland, I took the film to the place in Zurich where I have my E6 processed (always with good results). I picked up the pictures yesterday and they are awful, with a terrible red color cast on the indoor pics and all sorts of ugly casts on the outdoor pics. Now, this is a film with which I am quite familiar and which always has given me good results. This is the last time I have taken a C41 film to this lab. Nobody will look after my film with the same care as I do. Nathan - --- Michael Darnton <mdarnton@hotmail.com> wrote: > In terms of consistency, I've had some of the worst > results from commercial > labs. Sometimes their attitude about chemistry is > that replacing it on a > regular basis costs money, so it's a good place to > cut costs. One lab I used > (supposedly the best lab in Chicago!) to send film > to went on about a two > month cycle--I could watch the film get worse and > worse, then suddenly > everything would be fine again, for about three > weeks. That's what finally > caused me to do the film myself--since I was doing > the printing, and the > negs from the lab were all over the map (exactly the > same subjects, with a > permanent lighting setup, by the way) I was spending > about 3X the time in > the darkroom with the labs negs than with mine!! > --Michael __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com