Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]><Snip> rated the Neopan 1600 at ASA 1200 and the results look overexposed. I used > only one roll to take some shots in a Jazz club under difficult, high contrast > light conditions: spot lights on the artists and dark background. So I do not > want to make general statements about film/development quality. But my feeling > is that it is not worth the hassle. Better stay with HP5+ and rate at ASA 400. ><Snip> > Hans-Peter That's cause you shot it at 1200. Says 1600 on the darn BOX! which is what i shoot it at. Which is what it really is if you ask me! Neopan shot at 1600 in Xtol looks better than Tri x ever did in the past! Mark Rabiner