Re: [Leica] Using f 4 35-70, f 4 80-200 zooms

["Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net>]

Thanks Ted, I know better than to try to compare it to the new f/2.8.
Bud

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Using f 4 35-70, f 4 80-200 zooms


> Bud Cook wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have an opinion about the older German-made f/3.5 35-70 vs.
the
> > current f/4.0.   Since the newer zoom came out, the older one has
dropped
> > significantly in price (and I believe you can get it w/three
cams).<<<<<<<<
>
> Hi Bud,
>
> I have the German manf. 35-70 3.5 and have used it as the main shooting
> lens on many occasions simply because I'm always surprised how sharp and
> nicely contrasted results it produces.  it handles well and is light. At
> 3.5 one doesn't use it indoors as one might a 2.8 but it's brightness is
> fine for working outdoors.
>
> I don't imagine it produces the edge cutting look of the 2.8 35-70.
> However I have screened
> 70-180 slides one right after the other during a presentation and they
> both screen very well.   So how would it compare to the 35-70 2,8?  I'll
> let you know after I win the lottery!  ;-)
>
> I'd suggest if you find a 35-70 3,5 for a good price and in good working
> order I'd buy it and make an effort at using it as one can only find out
> from their own technique how well they like a lens look and handling.
>
> It's no big deal, as you can always sell it if you don't like it! But I
> bet if you get one you'll not  part with it.  But be warned .... it
> doesn't focus as close as the f.4.0 and at times, although a minor
> issue, I've found it a negative point of the lens.
> regards,
> ted
>