Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Suggestion for Second body
From: "Jerry S. Justianto" <jsjm6@cbn.net.id>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 00:35:17 +0700
References: <002c01bfc8be$1d194500$25c4ead1@pc>

Thanks for all the suggestions friends,

I rather wait some more time to wait for hands on experience with Hexar.  If
not I probably go for 4-2p or M6 TTL chrome.

Best Regards,

Jerry S. Justianto
http://www.searchindonesia.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Larsen <ohlen@sierratel.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Suggestion for Second body


> Jerry writes:
>
> |I plan to purchase a second body, my kit right now is
> |M6HM, 35 cron ASPH, Noct, 75 Lux. SF20
>
>
> Nice kit.  You are pretty much loaded for darkness.
>
> I would eliminate the Bessa R from the competition since none of your
current
> lenses will fit it (M mount vs. screw mount).
>
> I would eliminate the Hexar until the camera reliability and durability
> becomes a proven commodity.
>
> Of the Leica M choices, you didn't mention the 0.72 M6 non TTL which
should
> still be available from dealers.  You might consider one of those since it
the
> function and feel would be the same as your 0.85.  (The 0.85 is probably
worth
> about the same as a new 0.85 TTL) --- Maybe two new TTLs?
>
> Regards, Bill Larsen
>
>
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Bill Larsen" <ohlen@sierratel.com> (Re: [Leica] Suggestion for Second body)