Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LHSA M6
From: Stephen Gandy <Stephen@CameraQuest.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:11:41 -0700
References: <200005261711.NAA07434@sushi.toad.net>

> > I thought I had my mind made up to get one of these. Now, I am having
> > second thoughts. Is this a sought after camera that LUG members would
> > buy if money was not a factor. In other words, is it a highly prized
> > item. I would use it  and not worship it. Any thoughts, pro or con?
> >

Don't Buy It.

The more LHSA are sold, the more production goes up (my guess is that it will be
less than 1,000 of both types).   The less rare the LHSA becomes,  the less it
will be worth.   More production means LESS long term value.

there were tens of thousands of photogs  too "smart" not to buy the Leica 72 for
$200 new.   Now mint examples are probably worth about $30,000

You can save about  $1100 by buying a plain Jane M6 TTL (new).  20 years from
now you will probably have a nice, but very average Leica M6TTL  worth an
average price.   Who can predict the value of a less than 1000 production black
paint M6 20 years from now ??   Just because a black mint M3 would now sell for
$15,000 up, or that the recent 2000 camera issue M6 Millennium quickly sells for
$3500 in Tokyo while its original price was $2700 just a few months ago, this
doesn't mean the LHSA will be worth any more than a plain Jane M6.  on the other
hand, maybe it will....

Stephen Gandy

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> (Re: [Leica] LHSA M6)
In reply to: Message from "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> (Re: [Leica] LHSA M6)