Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 17:11:11 -0700
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell> <4.2.2.20000525172932.00ab7c20@infoave.net> <392DB421.2099D20F@home.com> <000d01bfc69f$e6676a20$b1cffea9@stephen>
 
"Stephen A. Talesnick" wrote:
> 
> WRONG STEPHEN, I am stephen@earthlink.net and have been for over 5 years.
> Please have your stephen check with earthlink and get the correct address.
> Thank you.  stephen@earthlink.net<<<<<<<<<<<

Hi Stephen,

Still not sure we got the right one! ;-)

Gee somewhere along the line here something is crewed-up as I see you've
got a bunch of messages that were supposed to go to another Stephen and
they all aren't from me.

I suppose it's one of those miracles of the internet! :-)

Sure hope somebody fixes it or good buddy you could have a bunch of messages.

kindest regards,

ted
In reply to: Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from "Stephen A. Talesnick" <stephen@talesnick.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)