Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tim Atherton wrote: > I have both eyes functioning, but have an odd condition (which I can never > remember that name of), whereby by they kinda function independently, so I > don't see in 3D either (and don't ask me to catch a ball!) SNIP > I've always wondered how it effects the way I see and photograph - as > photographs come out 2D - maybe it's an advantage? Maybe it gives something > of a different vision? I don't know. (also why I like the Hockney quote!)<<<<<<<<<<< Hi Tim, I'm sure it has effected how you "see photographically" as in composition and balance of perspective. How I see isn't something I can explain easily. Without question being one eyed has made an effect on how I relate to elements within the viewfinder, whether that be an M6 or an R8 and how they go together in composition. I just look at the scene, whatever it maybe and it's like everything is exactly where it should be and I press the shutter release without ever really thinking about all the subjects bits and pieces. If I were to say I see in the same fashion as a two eyed photographer looking at a 2 dimensional photograph I'm not sure that would be correct, but I suppose that's the way it is, simply because I only see in 2 dimension. In other words, I see everything as though it's already lying on the surface of a print or recorded on a piece of slide film. The Leica just records exactly the way I see in it's two dimension plain. I've been told by opthamologists that I've learned to see in a different manner to folks who have both eyes functioning and what some people consider a handicap is actually an asset of seeing differently. So in that case it's great being a one eyed photographer! :-) Better still using Leicas to record how I see. :-) ted