Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] pinholes
From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:05:18 -0700
References: <B54ED0E8.E41E%deadman@jukebox.demon.co.uk>

At 11:48 AM -0400 5/22/00, Tom Schofield wrote:
>1)  As small as you can make it.

No, no, no! The right size hole is one where the benefits of making it
smaller, so that less spreading of the image occurs, is just balanced by
the benefits of making it larger to reduce diffraction effects. This
balance is extremely important. As diffraction effects are a function of
the perimeter length and the area of the opening, it is also very important
to have a clean, circular opening through as thin a material as possible.
Gold is best, as it can be made very thin while still opaque, but brass is
very good and is the usual choice.

   *            Henning J. Wulff
  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
 /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
 |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

Replies: Reply from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] pinholes)
Reply from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] pinholes)
In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <deadman@jukebox.demon.co.uk> ([Leica] pinholes)