Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --- AWSteg <upstream1@mindspring.com> wrote: > There is a place in this world for each of these > tools. To argue about it > is absurd! Would you argue about only using a hand > saw made with German > steel Vs a Dewalt power saw with an American Blade > saying that "you are > power saw." Please! The M6 is a great camera and > the glass is great. The > Contax G2 is a great camera with great glass and > autofocus and motor drive > and bracking. . .but, there are batteries involved > and that can present a > problem sometimes. The F5 or F100 are great cameras > and I think the glass > is not quite as sharp, but faced with a photographic > problem or job that was > better solved with an F5, I would choose the F5. > Under the right set of > circumstances the F5 would produce a better product. > If the M6 was the > correct tool, then the M6 would be the tool of > choice, same with the G2. . > ..or for that matter a digital camera. This Arian > glass mindset gets tedious > and unrealistic in my book. > It's Aryan, by the way, and I'm Italian. I wasn't talking about M's either. I use SL2's, the best 35mm reflex ever made. What I argued in my previous post still stands. Find a group with a lower IQ (or lower self-esteem) than professional photographers and I'll eat my hat. I've worked with them. I know. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/