Re: [Leica] Re: LUGKodak versus Fuji: is that the issue?

["Gerry Walden" <gerrywalden@cwcom.net>]

I have never had any problems with quality of processing here in the UK.

Gerry


- ----- Original Message -----
From: ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: 24 April 2000 05:44
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LUGKodak versus Fuji: is that the issue?


> Can anyone comment on the quality of Kodachrome processing in Europe and
Japan?
>
> Thanks, Ray
>
> Tina Manley wrote:
>
> > At 06:19 PM 4/23/00 -0700, you wrote:
> > >As I intensively go over old work and scan and print it into a new
> > >portfolio, my
> > >conclusion is the same. The Kodachrome stands out above all the rest in
the
> > >images it produces digital or otherwise. Wish it still came in larger
> > >sizes and
> > >you could still get it in Professional. A Kodachrome comeback is in
order and
> > >that is what I am expecting.
> > >Mark Rabiner
> >
> > What strikes me as I go over old work is how much is missing because it
was
> > ruined by Qualex!!  I have a file full of "We are sorry, but due to a
> > processing error...."  letters.  Unless Kodak also enforces quality
control
> > with their new labs, I will stick with Fuji that I can develop myself.
If
> > it is ruined, I only have myself to blame.  My track record is much
better
> > than Qualex's!
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > Tina Manley, ASMP
> > http://www.tinamanley.com
>