Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LUGKodak versus Fuji: is that the issue?
From: ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:44:25 +0800

Can anyone comment on the quality of Kodachrome processing in Europe and Japan?

Thanks, Ray

Tina Manley wrote:

> At 06:19 PM 4/23/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >As I intensively go over old work and scan and print it into a new
> >portfolio, my
> >conclusion is the same. The Kodachrome stands out above all the rest in the
> >images it produces digital or otherwise. Wish it still came in larger
> >sizes and
> >you could still get it in Professional. A Kodachrome comeback is in order and
> >that is what I am expecting.
> >Mark Rabiner
>
> What strikes me as I go over old work is how much is missing because it was
> ruined by Qualex!!  I have a file full of "We are sorry, but due to a
> processing error...."  letters.  Unless Kodak also enforces quality control
> with their new labs, I will stick with Fuji that I can develop myself.  If
> it is ruined, I only have myself to blame.  My track record is much better
> than Qualex's!
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com