Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There are a number of contact printing frames available for 35mm negatives. Basically they are a base with a foam pad a bit bigger than 8x10, and a sheet of glass that hinges down over the pad to hold negatives in contact with the paper underneath. Six strips of 6 frames will fit on an 8x10. If you cut in 4s you'll only get 24 frames on a sheet. Paterson used to make a contact printer that had a mask that held strips in alignment (you could load it in the light, then turn out the lights, put a piece of paper in some clips and fold the lot down onto the pad) and exposed some lines for subject, date and technical info at the top of the sheet as well. Others may offer similar devices. If your film tends to curl up lengthwise (Tech Pan is the worst in this respect, of the films that I've tried) one of these contact printers with alignment strips avoids a lot of frustration. If your film will lie flat, it's not much of a trick to just lay the strips out on the paper and fold the glass down on top of them, although you do need to be gentle in order not to push the film out of alignment - this may be less of a problem if you use strips of 4 instead of 6. While there is a fair bit of information in a 35m contact print, you need a good magnifier to see it (I've come to prefer a 5x loupe that attaches to a pair of strong drug store reading glasses - this gives the least interference with light reaching the surface of the contact while you try to evaluate it.) Hope this helps. Cheers, Kip Andrew Moore wrote: > I usually don't make contact sheets from my (OT: Leica) > 35 mm negatives because I simply don't have a way of > doing it with good results. I'd like to start making contact > sheets now. Is there any equipment or techniques that > would really help here, particularly for holding a set of > negative strips (4 frames per) aligned and flat while the > exposure is made? > > Thanks, > --Andrew > NO ARCHIVE