Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is probably the reason they won't do it... - ---------- From: Tom Schofield Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 3:19 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 Wide Angle Body Why not 21mm, 24, 28, 35, 50? Tom Schofield - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henry Ambrose" <digphoto@nashville.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 11:54 AM Subject: [Leica] M6 Wide Angle Body > 24, 28, 35, 50 frames! > > Yes, Yes, Yeeeesssssssssssssssssssssss! > > > > Henry Ambrose > > >What would be really nice would be, in addition to a wide-angle M, a > >viewfinder fix for the present M6... > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jeremy Kime > >Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 8:53 AM > >To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > >Subject: RE: [Leica] The M6 Fugue > > > > > >This suggestion (for a wide angle version) was put to Leica at the last > >Photokina meeting. > >They seemed vaguely interested. > > > >Jem > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: B. D. Colen [SMTP:bdcolen@earthlink.net] > >> > >> Far too logical a suggestion - why offer the camera with a set of frames > >> for > >> the lenses for which it's most suited? > >> B. D. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >> JohnnyDeadman > >> > >> on 23/3/00 11:18 am, Julian Thomas at Mimesis@btinternet.com wrote: > >> > >> > Now, how about an M6 w/a with frames only for 21-28mm?!! > >> 21, 24, 28 and 35!! > >> A brilliant idea. > >> > >> Johnny Deadman > >> > > >