Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] M6 Wide Angle Body
From: Austin Franklin <austin@darkroom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:46:00 -0500

This is probably the reason they won't do it...

- ----------
From: 	Tom Schofield
Sent: 	Thursday, March 23, 2000 3:19 PM
To: 	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: 	Re: [Leica] M6 Wide Angle Body


Why not 21mm, 24, 28, 35, 50?

Tom Schofield

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry Ambrose" <digphoto@nashville.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 11:54 AM
Subject: [Leica] M6 Wide Angle Body


> 24, 28, 35, 50 frames!
>
> Yes, Yes, Yeeeesssssssssssssssssssssss!
>
>
>
> Henry Ambrose
>
> >What would be really nice would be, in addition to a wide-angle M, a
> >viewfinder fix for the present M6...
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jeremy Kime
> >Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 8:53 AM
> >To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
> >Subject: RE: [Leica] The M6 Fugue
> >
> >
> >This suggestion (for a wide angle version) was put to Leica at the last
> >Photokina meeting.
> >They seemed vaguely interested.
> >
> >Jem
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: B. D. Colen [SMTP:bdcolen@earthlink.net]
> >>
> >> Far too logical a suggestion - why offer the camera with a set of
frames
> >> for
> >> the lenses for which it's most suited?
> >> B. D.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >> JohnnyDeadman
> >>
> >> on 23/3/00 11:18 am, Julian Thomas at Mimesis@btinternet.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > Now, how about an M6 w/a with frames only for 21-28mm?!!
> >> 21, 24, 28 and 35!!
> >> A brilliant idea.
> >>
> >> Johnny Deadman
> >>
> >
>