Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought you had confirmed the crappy quality of Leica ages ago...yet you still are buying their stuff? Serves you right. Dan C. At 08:32 AM 09-03-00 EST, you wrote: >In a message dated 3/9/00 6:03:49 AM Central Standard Time, arbos@silva.net >writes: > ><< am not an observant worshiper of "made in Germany" and prefer "made by > Leica", although I know "made in Germany" still has special value to quite a > few people. > > Cheers, > > Mikiro > Strasbourg, Europe > http://arbos.silva.net >> > >A number of longtime Leica users had been suspicious of the "made in Germany" >label being slapped on "Leica" brand equipment because of the quality of the >merchandise that was tumbling from boxes marked "Made in Germany." It is now >apparent those concerns were well founded. > >This weekend I was shooting in a wild animal park that allows animals to >approach the vehicles with the M-3 and the new APO-TELYT-M 3.4 135 MM lens. >I found I was constantly having to check the diaphragm ring to be sure it was >still set at 5.6. The slightest touch or rub against the clothing changed >the diaphragm setting. > >Up return, I compared the APO-TELYT-M 3.4 135 MM lens with the Tele-Elmar >that I purchased in the mid-60's. I almost wish I had not made the >comparison. The old Tele-Elmar, after over 30 years of use still has a nice >tight focusing feel and the diaphragm requires a definite effort to move it >rather than a slight rub against the sleeve. > >The APO-TELYT-M 3.4 135 MM lens on the other hand, has a sloppy feeling >focusing mechanism and the diaphragm feels as if it had been made in some >area just coming out of the stone age and the adjustment was just plain >sloppy. > >This "made in Germany" label must really shame true German craftsmen who know >true precision craftsmanship and know this is not reflective of their "made >in Germany" work. > >Thanks Mikiro for confirming this problem. > >Don > >