Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]How can you consider a slighly blurry viewfinder that does not allow you to see objects BEFORE they enter the frame from the side to be "better?" An no optical focusing is better? The superiority of Zeiss optics has become apparent to whom? Ken wWilcox At 9:25 AM -0500 2/29/0, ARTHURWG@aol.com wrote: >More to the point than Leica vs. Nikon is the question of Leica vs. Contax, >namely the G2. It's become apparent that the Japanese-made Zeiss optics are >equal or better than many/most Leitz offerings. Coupled with a better view >finder, a very good auto focus and much less money, Contax has to be the >leader among 35 mm rangefinders. Right?? DO NOT use the reply fuction! Address any response to wilcox@tir.com - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com> <kwilcox@gfn.org>