Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Some of you may know of my fondness for pseudo-divided D76. For those of you who don't, it's a bastardised version of properly divided D76, or D76-D. In this and most divided developers, the first bath is the developing agent, the second the alkali (accelerator). Pseudo-divided D76 uses straight D76 stock as the first bath, followed by an alkali (typically 1.5% sodium metaborate or 'Kodalk', though some people swear by borax). The effect is very similar, except the negs are a bit snappier, which is a good thing in my experience. I won't go into the advantages here, but they are legion -- especially for street photography or 'challenging' lighting situations where a whole roll of 35mm film is exposed under different conditions -- and I will fill anyone in who's interested by private email (I posted a long description to the LUG about this about six months ago). This was my standard process until I went over to Xtol. It doesn't work with thin-emulsion films, so Tri-X is kind of mandatory. Results with TMY in particular are horrible. For a long while I've wondered what would happen if Xtol, which is a great developer, was pseudo-divided, so today I tried the following, all @ 68F. I don't know anyone else who has tried this... maybe I'm the first. Anyway: Xtol stock 3' Kodalk 1.5% 3' (transferred without rinsing) stop/fix as normal I exposed a couple of rolls of Tri-X @ every EI from 100 to 1600, and dunked them as above. I kind of thought it couldn't possibly work, but it does. In fact it works perfectly. Gives me an EI somewhere between 400-600, which is about what I get from Xtol anyway. But all the negs from 100-1600 were printable, with *no* blocked highlights. Gradation in both highlights and shadows looks good and grain is what you would expect from Xtol stock (very fine). There is probably some slight sacrifice of sharpness, but I'd say it's a fair exchange for the very marked compensating effect and printability. Maybe someone else would like to try this and give their comments? - -- John Brownlow photos: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com music: http://www.jukebox.demon.co.uk