Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come, on, Mike....First off, we're discussing art, not higher math, physics, etc., which are utterly inaccessible to those who don't study them... I realize that I'm pontificating on quick sand here, but I do think there's a difference between pandering to the "masses," who presumably think those Keene paintings of big-eyed kids are high art, and producing art whose meaning can be understood by someone who gives it some thought. Yes, there is art that takes study, just the way higher math - well, in my case, lower arithmetic ;-) - takes study. But FAR too often, those who are unable to convey their message hide behind the argument that what they have produced is "art," and if you can't understand it, dear viewer, the fault is yours. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 10:15 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Crap-o-la >>>"Inaccessible" is, in this case, a synonym for "crap."<<< In which case, astrophysics and higher mathematics are crap. Not to mention Japanese calligraphy, and Latin. Economics is certainly crap! Kant has got to be crap. St. Augustine? Crap-o-la. Just because 99/100ths of all the photography presented in the world panders to the public's conceit of instant and automatic accessibility doesn't mean that it all has to be that way. Not everything is easy to get. Keep looking. - --Mike