Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Chromogenic nightmares
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:33:13 -0500

I have one roll of 120 XP-1 that I took in the mid 80s.  Looking at it
recently I was shocked to see how much it faded.  It looks as if it were 2
stops (or more) under exposed, except I know at the time they were exposed
properly, and printed easily.

Dan C.

At 08:07 AM 15-02-00 +0000, Mike Johnston wrote:
>The downside of chromogenic films is that your negatives AREN'T
>ARCHIVAL. Over the years I have heard so many horror stories I can't
>even begin to tell you. We receive regular pleas for help at the
>magazine from people whose chromogenic negatives are fading away. I've
>seen examples that are almost gone. Bad fading can occur within 5 years.
>It's true that some people report no problems after 15 years, but
>others--MANY others--report the opposite. Personally, I wouldn't touch
>the stuff with somebody else's ten-foot pole. If you expect or intend to
>keep your negatives, BEWARE.
>
>At the very least, do your own processing, and DO NOT trust a commercial
>lab or a minilab.
>
>--Mike Johnston / Editor
>_PHOTO Techniques_ magazine
>www.phototechmag.com
>
>
>