Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jonathan Borden wrote: >but for serious, spontaneous photography the M6 can't be beat. That's my experience as well. Most recently, I've been photographing pre-school children both indoors and outdoors. Outdoors I've been using an R8 with zoom lenses. The 80-200 has been very effective. But indoors where I'm very close to the children and where sound (or flash) would be a distraction, the M6 has been a wonderful ally. The lighting changes throughout the classrooms are extreme. Even if I metered every corner before photographing, the combination of window light and overhead light would change the readings as people move through the space and kids/teachers re-grouped. I'm trying to catch the nuances of a very intimate, complex, high-speed "dance" under trying circumstances. I can't think of any camera I'd rather have than the M6. With respect to lenses. While I most often use a 35mm or 50mm, a 28mm lens is also a necessity for larger classroom groupings and to create a sense of spaciousness. For closeups, I wish I had a 75mm. I'd use is as my primary portrait lens for these circumstances. My 90mm is adequate, but somewhat too narrow for the classroom work I'm doing and requires a faster shutter speed. Aside from portraits, maximum lens aperture is less an issue for me because in two's and three's the kids move so quickly I need all the depth of field I can get. I shoot at f/2.8, if I can. Need I say, this project is a joy to work on. - --Gib