Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica Camera of the century? Why!
From: Buzz Hausner <Buzz@marianmanor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:36:12 -0500

While I still vote for the Barnack cameras, I would have to cast my vote for
making the SLR available to the average shooter to Miranda, especially the
D, Dr, and F, way before the AE-1.

	Buzz

- -----Original Message-----
From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) [mailto:peterk@lucent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 2:22 PM
To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica Camera of the century? Why!


Interesting perspective, but could we not also say that the AE-1 enabled the
average person to have an SLR? And take photos they would not have taken
otherwise, even with a brownie, since the AE-1 was an SLR.  Besides, the
AE-1 forced manufacturers to make more affordable cameras....oooopss, sorry
I guess I wasn't thinking. 

Peter K

- -----Original Message-----
From: Ruralmopics@aol.com [mailto:Ruralmopics@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 10:17 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Camera of the century? Why!


Nah, you guys are living in a dream world. The Leica as camera of the 
century? Sheez, like anyone cares about Leicas or photography anymore . . . 
the camera of the century is the Canon AE-1. Besides selling more than 
probably any other "sophisticated" camera in history it is almost 
single-handedly responsible for dumbing down the buying public in regards to

photography. Yep, the Canon AE-1 must mark the end of photography as a 
popular hobby. The camera was so counter-intuitive in anything but dummy
mode 
it's little wonder almost none of the millions who bought the damn thing
ever 
advanced in their hobby. It truly is an abomination and therefore deserves 
the title camera of the century based on it's impact to the pastime . . . 
Want to know why nobody today knows what a Leica is? Blame the AE-1. 

Bob (face anything but straight) McEowen


In a message dated 1/12/00 10:58:22 AM, bdcolen@earthlink.net writes:

>If there is going to be a "camera of the Century" - and, yes, it's a silly
>
>concept - I believe that that camera should be the Leica rangefinder...Not
>
>necessarily because it did or didn't take the most important photos of
>the 
>Century, but because it philosophically made them possible