Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Chris asked >. Does prewet mean that you can >reduce the developing time? No. Think about it; if you presoak you saturate the emulsion with plain water. When you immerse the film in the dev, it takes a small period of time for the developer in the concentrated developer solution to diffuse into the water contained in the wet film and begin to react. When you plunge a dry film directly into the dev the dev laden fluid soaks straight into the emulsion; it will begin to react almost immediately. I doubt if it makes a lot of difference, though. (This is all very different from "water-bath" development BTW.) The instructions for some rotary tube processors- like my Jobo- suggest using a presoak, but I think this is more to do with stabilising the temperature of drum, spiral and film. After a lot of experiment, I've dispensed with the step altogether. It seems to make no difference whatever to the required dev time, even when measured using step wedges and a densitometer. I think one factor- the equalised temp- is being cancelled out by the other- the need for the developer to diffuse into the emulsion. But that's only a hunch- perhaps there aresome phyisicists out there who could she light? Cheers Rod