Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2000-01-03-04:37:42 B. D. Colen: > (Would you believe, Bernard, that there are some of us who believe that > Ansel Adams was an incredible photo technician, but a pretty mediocre > artist?) You and me both, O my brother! I'm grateful to him for having helped take some of the guesswork out of the process of going from image to print, and to be fair, I've seen a few portraits and color industrial landscapes (!) of his which were at least intriguing to look at, but for the most part his work just doesn't engage me. To take a potshot at another sacred cow: I've generally tended to find Ralph Gibson's work somehow, well, obvious and unnecessary. I'm sure that's just another personal failing of mine. ;-) Okay, here's where I expose a rich and unbecoming vein of hubris: I've always viewed the best of Cartier-Bresson's work, with its seemingly impossible combinations of lovely formal compositions with split-second timing, as an unattainable ideal I can keep striving for; I view Salgado's work as not too far off what I could do if I had the gumption to actually get in the thick of where pictures like that can be made, which I apparently don't. It's not just about working the camera...