Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Perhaps HP5+ is ahead in some respects, but I prefer Tri-X for its versitility. It pushes MUCH better than HP5+, at least for me. 1600-3200 and still very nice. Ken Wilcox At 4:28 +0000 12/31/99, a fine scholar, D Khong wrote: > >I would vote for the developer. I have my doubts that Tri-X has been >improved upon and that the virtues of Tri-X are often overrated. I have >used both Tri-X and HP5+ and the latter is miles ahead. This impression is >confirmed in an article in LFI 8/99 by Roger Hicks. > >Dan K. > > > - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com> <kwilcox@gfn.org>