Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica]The value of Popular Photography
From: "Jerry S. Justianto" <jsjm6@cbn.net.id>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 10:20:16 +0700

In Indonesia, for me to read the January Edition of PopPhoto will be in
March 2000.
Can you please tell me the conclusion of the article about M6TTL?

Regards,
JSJ


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff S <4season@boulder.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica]The value of Popular Photography


> Free publicity is a great thing, though I think Popular Photo's glory
> days were in the '60s and '70s (thicker, more columns), so today, I'd
> think Leica might also benefit from getting coverage elsewhere,
> including some non-photographic magazines with the right reader
> demographics.
>
> And they already have an email newsletter, but don't announce zingers or
> "members-only pre sales" or indeed, anything that would make a person
> stand outside the nearest store fifteen minutes before opening. They
> have been mailing out Leica View lately, but email lists are lots
> cheaper. The newsletters could link to the Leica website, which could
> link to dealers (who would have reciprocal links)
>
> But on the whole, I think Mr. Cohn really does "get it".
>
>
> Dan S wrote:
> >
> > So what is the value of the mag?  MARKETING.  Leica should be thrilled
that
> > they got a decent review in Pop Photo, not because the testing is worth
the
> > paper it is written on, but because that one crappy biased magazine will
> > generate more sales of M's and lenses than all the "M campaign"
brochures in
> > the world.
> >
> > It has exposure, and that is the one thing Leica really needs now.
> > Too many people just don't know the company even exists.
>
> --
>
> Jeff Segawa
> Somewhere in Boulder, Colorado
> http://www.boulder.net/~4season
>
>