Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 9:39 AM -0500 12/11/99, RBedw51767@aol.com wrote: >your example. Todays teenage boys and girls have >already seen more on the net than a naked woman standing in the window. >This may be offensive to you but it will not even get a giggle from todays >teens. To think differently is certainly being naive. This is naive, lumping all kids on the net into this category. This is certainly not the case. I don't know if Gary's description of the photo is true or not, but if he's right - and I have no reason to doubt it at this point, since the page is down - I find this discussion typical of net interchange. People jump on the person they perceive to be trying to criticize nudity, when that wasn't it at all. It was his opinion, and that is that. >. He has assumed that >other LUGGERS were adults and would accept his examples in the same light >that they were intended. And you think this assumption is correct? Close doesn't count. Assume is always a dangerous approach. - -- - -- Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA I can resist anything but temptation.