Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My point was not that the image was pornography. I do not think it is. My point is that that image is not NECESSARY to show the abilities or lack of with his 2000. Uncalled for and unnecessary. Maybe sleazy would be a better word. Gary Jeff Moore wrote: > 1999-12-10-15:40:22 Gary D. Whalen: > > Shame on you. Your picture is a cancer to this newsgroup. > > Well. Gary has a few issues. > > Were I to feel compelled to render judgement, I wouldn't have gone > much beyond "mildly tacky". But I don't, so I didn't say that. :-)