Re: [Leica] Re: which lens to choose

["Rick Floyd" <rick_floyd@hotmail.com>]

I know those decisions are always difficult and I always hated it when the
concensus was to buy the lens that is right for you.  However, that is the
best choice.  I agree with Mike that you will make the best possible images
you can make regardless of what focal length you start with.

With that in mind, what _I_ did was to purchase the 50 Summicron.  I have
used it exclusively for almost 2 years before recently purchasing the 35
Summicron ASPH.  I really like the 50 mm focal length, I have learned it
very well and am just beginning to explore the world of 35 with the new
purchase.  Could I have done it in reverse order?  Sure.

There is one complaint I have with the 50 Summicron, especially compared to
the new 35 Summicron ASPH - FLARE.  Bright, pinpoint sources are handled
very well by both lenses.  The 50 seems to have a very difficult time with
filtered or diffused backlighting behind the subject.  Better than most
lenses, but not even close to the 35 Summicron ASPH.  This may be important
for the type of photography you are interested in - maybe not.

As to the decision of the 0.72 or 0.85 viewfinder, I decided on the 0.72.  I
liked being able to shoot with both eyes open on the 0.85, but was not
comfortable with the 35 frame.  Also, the M is the first camera to help with
my tendency to be "tunnel visioned" with my photography.  The 0.72 and 50mm
lens is the perfect match FOR ME.

By the way, do I remember correctly that the Hexar has a 0.60x finder?

Hope this helps,
Rick