Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 11/18/1999 2:32:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, henningw@archiphoto.com writes: << I don't think the ASPH ever meant as much on any other lens as on the 35/1.4 M. Also, ASPH is quite rare on the R line, not being an 'R' user >> Is that because the pre-ASPH 1.4 had such a large amount of flare and aberration at the wide apertures and such is not the case with the other lenses? Bob