Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been a holdout on this lens. However, last Saturday I was stuck in Dallas for the afternoon. When I told Sherry Krauter that I was going to be there, she gave me info about a camera show in Mesquite. Well, I went and saw not very much Leica stuff but enough to get me in "trouble." I bought a new 35mm 1.4 ASPH. Then off to San Antonio for three days of meetings and some picture taking. I had both the old and the ASPH Summiluxes. In short, the differences between the lenses are not subtle. As many have noted here before, the ASPH has a different look, but it is a look that I find truly awesome. At last, here is an F1.4 35mm lens that is truly useable at 1.4 and not just for the effect. True, it does not produce that ethereal look of the older Summilux -a kind of shimmer or dreamy halo. However,the older M version needs to be stopped down to 2.8 before it begins to approach the ASPH wide open in terms of resolution,detail rendering,color saturation and gradation and my feeling is that it never does match the ASPH at any aperture. Erwin says it in his tests and I saw it easily on drugstore prints! I guess it depends on what you want in a photo but I have to say that this lens is the most exciting piece of photo gear that I have purchased in many years. Does this mean that I now have to look at the ASPH lens for my R system as well? Bob Figlio