Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Leica Rep in question isa very knowledgeable and quite nice individual who I have conversed with on several occassions over the years, and who frequently leads seminars providing free use of all the latest goodies, including wonderful the Monterey photo shoot Saturday. You are reading too much into what his comments were about the LUG. All he said was that he got tired of being told he was wrong when providing information in response to questions. After all, his fiull time job is being knowledgeable about the Leica line! If you think people are hiding his name, I have seen it in at least a half-dozen posts in the last two days! Also, as far as comments regarding unfulfilled promises by Reps, they are at the mercy of New Jersey, and in turn Solms, as to estimated delivery dates, so don't shoot the messenger! - ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 3:21 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Cheap Shot > Is there a reason why this Leica Rep. is nameless? I didn't know of any Rep. on > the List. Did he use his title he should have. I didn't hear of any conversation > of some guy telling a rep. he didn't know what he was talking about. And he > should have had the tact to not refer to us as a bunch of losers. Obviously > anyone who speaks to anyone in a rude or disrespectful manner is a loser or any > other pejorative one could come up with, but that could hardly represent the > majority or significant number of this 1000 people plus list. Did he get his > feelings hurt? No reason to act so blatently unprofessional. Having a thin skin > is not a proper attribute for a Camera Rep. > Mark Rabiner >