Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 90mm M Lens opinions?
From: "Eric Ho" <eric.ho@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 23:02:52 +0800

Take a look at http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/m/tests/M20-90.html  It has
some comparisons between the different 90 models.

Hope this helps!

eh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Skip
> Williams
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 9:48 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; leica@topica.com
> Subject: [Leica] 90mm M Lens opinions?
>
>
> I know this might stir up some controversy, but I'd like to get
> an opinion
> from the group.  I'm trying to decide on what 90 to buy for my M6.
>
> Is there a practical (non $$) difference between the 90/2 Apo
> Summicron and
> the 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit?  I know there's about a $1k price
> difference, but
> is it worth it. (that's a very loaded question).
>
> My first inclination is to buy a last-generation 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit (the
> small one), and come back in 1-2 yrs and get a 90/2 Apo Summicron when
> the're more plentiful.  That'd give me a 90 to work with now and
> not break
> my bank account.
>
> Skip
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Skip Williams
> Westfield, NJ
> skipwilliams@pobox.com
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>