Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Reminds me of starting out in photography as a junior high age kid. The 8x10 prints always impressed Mom a whole lot more than the 3x5s she was used to seeing. Of course, the first question out of her mouth was always, "How much does that paper cost?" I guess some things never change Bob McEowen (you mean they actually make paper smaller than 8x10?) McEowen In a message dated 10/27/99 12:11:47 PM, mrabiner@concentric.net writes: >A stack of 8x10s is a stack of 8x10s, nothing more. The consistently can >also as > >you say work against you. Your work is put in the category of every shlock > >glossy promo ferrotyped autographed 8x10 ever made. 11x14's are certainly >much > >less of a cliche. I think of a shot i saw of Eugene Smith with boxes of >11x14 > >paper with prints spilling out all over the place. Both Roy Moss and Tom > >Abrahamsson had 11x14's which struck me as way more serious than my curly >box of > >8x10's last week.