Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In one of our recent debates about digital vs. analog we touched on the issue of preserving digital information. Although not directly relevant to Leica rangefinder use per se, I believe that Leica users have an unusually keen interest in preserving information of all sorts (negatives, prints, picture databases, product manuals, product literature, articles about Leica, manuscripts of books that they have written, etc.) The longevity of the cameras makes it meaningful to preserve this information for many years. Since much of this information may be in digital form, it is a good thing to think about some of the issues surrounding preserving digital information for the future. Now it is absolutely true that digital files can be copied perfectly. What makes digital information fragile is that the stored bits need to be interpreted by software, and software keeps changing. Therefore, it is not enough to simply keep copying bits before the physical media they are stored on wears out (a process called refreshing), you have to keep transforming the bits into formats that can still be interpreted (a process called migrating). As a result, usable digital archives require some degree of constant attention. You can reduce the effort required somewhat by storing your bits in slowly changing, non-proprietary formats, and using platform independent external media. For example, you might use CD-ROM as your external media, and store photographs as .TIFF, rather than in native Photoshop formats. In the absence of international standards for archival formats, which are supported by commercially available software, you are essentially betting on what formats can be read in the future. As a fall back, you need to continue to archive good old analog artifacts (negatives, prints, manuscripts printed on archival paper with archival inks.) A more detailed overview of the problems, from the standpoint of research librarians, can be found in a white paper at the following web site: http://www.rlg.org/ArchTF/index.html Disclaimer: although I have been a software engineer for some ten years, I am not a professional expert in archiving digital media, so I will eagerly confess to appalling ignorance about the subject, on many levels. Hope this information helps some of you. Mark Davison