Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well boys girls and others [as my Mother used to say], It is my turn to pontificate on the new rangefinder to the world's stable. Firstly let me say, that it suggests to me that we have been a bit harsh on Leica over the last few years in our many and endless critisisms of their old/obsolete technology, but more of that at the end. When I first reviewed the Fuji/Hasselblad X-pan [see the section on my home page for the details] I was astonished with how closely the imposter had copied the original. Now we see Konica by the comments of CdI doing the same, only both have 1/125 sync, vertical shutters, motors and battery dependence and AE auto exposure with exposure "lock". You will see from my review that the X-Pan is not suited to using the AE when the camera is hand held especially in lower light situations, as there is no shutter speed information in the viewfinder. You have to pull the camera away from the eye and look at the LED panel on the cameras back. This is a VERY tiresome procedure, so I use the Camera like the M6 in Manual mode. I set the shutter speed [and thus know it] and rotate the aperture to light up the LED's. Unlike the M6 these are a bit hard to read in bright light, which is a surprise when the camera is not really suited to low light situations [slow lenses whose vignetting requires 2 stops to f8 to cure]. The Hexar would appear to have the shutter speed information in the viewfinder, but of course this will clutter and annoy those who would use it in manual mode ;-) or does the camera turn that off when its in Manual mode --- no they couldn't be that "understanding" of the desires of the manual rangefinder user at this early stage of their corporate exploration could they? Like the Konica the X-Pan has an viewfinder with considerable demagnification, though I cannot tell you exactly how much. This is of course necessary for the panoramic mode, and is not likely to have been a sweetener for glasses wearers. The rangefinder is bright and the camera is easy to focus, though I missed my focus tab. Konica's lens does not have the focus tab either. On the shutter of the X-Pan is a white area that the camera uses to measure exposure, and cannot really be any better than the Leica or Konica systems. There is no TTL flash control on X-Pan, though I presume there is on the Konica. The X-Pan is very well made, and the Konica "looks" the same. The X-Pan motor is very quiet, and it winds the film through to the end before the first exposure. We hear [sic] that the Konica is noisy, and that it does not. I would make a plea for the former. I prefer the camera to wind back into the cassette. Noise is less of a problem when I load a camera than when it "unpredicably" finishes the roll. Both X-Pan and Konica would seem to owe a lot of their design features and style to the Leica. Perhaps these cameras do come from the same stable. So hats off to Leica, its exposure system is old, but has not been advanced by the newcomers, who in the case of X-Pan do not even have TTL flash. It suffers limitations from its "old" [but reliable] shutter, and the new kids pick up a few features by replacing it. Its viewfinder remains unsurpassed, and its rangefinder/framing options have been copied. Its rangefinder is copied, but the new kids have lost the "accuracy" needed to use fast lenses. Its loading is "unique", but the camera body is uncompromising. It requires manual winding, but hell, we have Tom's rapidwinder, and we don't need noise. Overall, the M series Leica remains the peak of rangefinder development, and like the Contax G series and the CLE before it, the new Konica Hexar may just prove to be a platform to tempt new users into the market. I add to this, that I am one of the group that believes that Leica do need an M7, but I hope it will be "better" than this hybrid Hexar, which is little more than the Minolta CLE model. Not that this is bad, but I suspect that to make a better rangefinder with more automatic features that REALLY work for the photographer, Leica will have to break the mould. cheers Alastair Firkin http://users.netconnect.com.au/~firkin/AGFhmpg.html