Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bonjour Jean-Claude, Having just looked at the slides again with a 10x loupe, I conclude that the grain lies somewhere between Delta 100 and Delta 400 (closer to the 100). Sharpness is good, but this is a bit more difficult to judge as all the shots are hand-held. I really should do som tripod-mounted statue shots to test this more rigorously. The main attraction will be projection and scanning. My next experiment will be to expose a roll at 400 and another roll at 800 to see how these results compare with the fast negative films. On a side note, processing Scala here in Brussels is quite reasonable--350 BEF or a bit more than $9 for a 36-exposure roll, mounted. And it takes 3 hours. Nathan Jean-Claude Berger wrote: > Hello Nathan, > > How does sharpness and grain compare to 100 and 400 ISO negative films? > > -- > Jean-Claude Berger (jcberger@jcberger.com) > Systems and RDBMS consultant (MCSE) > Lyon, France > http://www.jcberger.com > > > I just looked at my first Agfa Scala slides (shot at 200) on the > > lighttable > > .... > > -- > > Nathan Wajsman > > Overijse, Belgium > > General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator > > Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman > > > > > > - -- Nathan Wajsman Overijse, Belgium General photo site: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator/ Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/