Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Underwear/things therein compared to Leica!
From: kabob@tiac.net (Bob Keene/Karen Shehade)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 07:35:50 -0400

Ahhh, but David,

this is the very *essence* of Leica!
Small, discreet, quick, and producing superior results-time after time!!!

;)

Bob K

>
>Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:00 +0100 (BST)
>From: dmorton@journalist.co.uk (David Morton)
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V11 #77
>
>Martin Howard writes:
>
>> ROTFLOL!  I can see that we are going to have *two* LUGgers who are
>> famous
>> for their respective underwear.  Just imagine a photography course in
>> which
>> Ted and Johnny team up.  Never mind the definition of `depth-of-field',
>> just
>> imagine trying to get the students not to mix up the `lens-cleaning'
>> underwear with the `small items pouch' underwear...! ;)
>
>I've seen some courageous posts in my time, but one suggesting that the
>underwear of LUG members contains only small items has to be one of the
>bravest yet. :-))))
>
>David Morton
>dmorton@journalist.co.uk
>
>------------------------------