Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] ....M vs R's...
From: "Mark E Davison" <Mark_E_Davison@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 04:59:15 -0700

TM Lee writes:
>>The replies to this thread so far have this in common - ie, the M is
unbeatable when it comes to focussing at low lite levels....  sorry... but
why is this so ?

It's because focussing on a ground glass (in the SLR) gets harder the dimmer
the image. Also the split image focus aid on many SLR screens has a very
short effective base line--too short to focus accurately enough to reliably
position the shallow in-focus region that you have when using a lens
wide-open.

>>Also, "best suited to wide angle pics..." - does this mean that the RF
isn't
suited to telephoto lenses ? Again, why is this so ? Is it due to the
'limited' rangefinder distance (58mm is it ? ) ?
Two problems really. 1) the fixed rangefinder baseline and 2) the ever
smaller framelines that you get with telephoto lenses.

I personally find I can only use my 135mm lens on my M6 indoors. In most
interior lighting I have to open the lens to f3.5, and I just cannot focus
it accurately enough to place the region of focus. On the other hand, no
problems with the 90mm lens indoors--the 90 is a great focal length for
portraits.



Mark Davison