Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doggone it, Guido! Now I be 'jonesin'' for an M6, and I haven't even got a Summilux, yet! Dan - - Frustrated in Leicaland - ----- Original Message ----- From: Guido Soprano <guidosoprano@hotmail.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 1:14 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk" Cameras > ABSOLUTELY, > > way to go Marc! > > GS > > PS, TomA does not have a metal organ. > > > >From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> > >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk" Cameras > >Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:44:00 -0400 > > > >At 05:27 PM 8/11/1999 -0500, Greg Chappell wrote: > > >There ARE more products today made better than comparable products of 50 > > >years ago (cameras included), but just ask people like Sherry Krauter at > > >Golden Touch Camera Repair if that applies to M4's vs. the new M6's being > > >produced today, comparing part to part. You can probably reverse, to some > > >extent, what you said below. I own both an M6 and M4 and LOVE both, but > >the > > >M4 IS a better built camera. > > > > > >For all of the many reasons pointed out by myself and others for so many > >years, this Just Is Not True. It is an urban myth. The M6 is the best > >built, best designed Leica RF camera ever. > > > >Marc > > > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 > >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com