Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]DonjR43198@aol.com wrote: >As for new manufacturing techniques, I am already advised the company is using files to make things fit rather than manufacturing them to fit. Someone from Solms must have taken a page out of the pre-WWII Japanese camera industry's book. Perhaps they’ve taken something out of their own book - that’s the way the pre-war screw Leicas were built. The practice continued to some degree into the post-war era. Back in March 1998 Erwin described how: "The most used assembly tool in the days of the famous M3 and M4 period was a wooded hammer to squeeze the parts into position as the production tolerances were a little (lax). The fine build of these products has been the result of diligent and laborious use of manual adjustments and the selecting of parts with matching tolerances. As a very competent analyst said in those days after visiting the factory and its assembly lines: the finest asset of the Leitz company is its competent and experienced workforce. That was the magic of the M3/4. I visit every year a gathering in Germany who call themselves 'Leitzianer' (Leitz people). And all stories are the same: judicious use of countless manhours of manual labour generated the M quality." I suspect we are reading too much into the passage from Leica about "alternative materials" - the English is simply unclear. All we can reliably draw from it is that in some cases existing materials and processes are causing too much expensive wastage, so alternatives will be sought. Regards, Doug Richardson