Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bernard wrote: > A.H.SCHMIDT wrote: > > > Dan S wrote: > > > > > So, you got a replacement of a 2000+ dollar camera on request. I'd > > say that > > > is pretty good service. Try that with Nikon... > > > > > > > Big deal, "pretty good service". If I buy a $2000 camera, I expect a > > $2000 service. If I buy a $25 camera, I can only expect a $25 service. > > It has got nothing to do what lousy - as I read between the lines > > from your comment - service Nikon provides. If you know beforehand, > > that the service is not up to scratch, why buy it? However, from a > > manufacturer, who prides himself, to have the best cameras, you would > > expect nothing, but the best service. If you actually get it, you > > don't have to crawl and suck up to them, just because you received, > > what should be normal anyway. > > What are you making noise about? The original poster got the service you > believe he is entitled to. Only he thinks to have been wrongfully dealt > with after getting his $2000 service. And in every transaction, both > parties have to stay polite; I don't see the connection to "crawl and > suck up". > > So what is *your* problem, Horst? > > Bernard I don't Think you got the gist of it. Its the tone that makes the musik, Bernhard!! Horst