Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 7/4/99 1:07:34 PM Central Daylight Time, bdcolen@earthlink.net writes: << By the way - Dr. Blacktape has issues a challenge, and wonders if any LUGers can pick out the few photos taken with a Nikkor 105 2.5 and a Canon SM 35 2.8 Serenar, rather than with M glass. Most of the photos were taken with the 35 Summilux ASPH and the 21 pre-ASPH. All were taken on XP2 Super and scanned with an HP PhotoSmart. >> These are wonderful snapshots of the family but I have to agree with Dr. Blacktape that the quality of the web prints is just that "web prints." The web just destroys the true quality that Leica or any other camera system provides. It is nice to be able to transmit photos over the wire but the quality is destroyed and Brownie box camera quality is what results. I could not even find an eyelash or hair in the photos that I examined. What should have been detail was just a blob. Kind of like looking at a tree from a few hundred yards away. No leaves, just a blob. I am presently checking out my 21 mm ASPH, 35 mm Summicron ASPH and 135 mm APO, and the negatives really look good but they were shots of high contrast subjects, in bright light, with EFKE KB 25 and Tech Pan from a solid tripod and then processed in T.E.C. or a Willi Beutler derivative for sharpness. For comparison purposes, the prints would be enlarged through an APO Rodagon or Componon and laid side-by-side for a a close look. Then an opinion could be formed. I am sure that the negatives of the family show many times more detail than is exhibited in on the monitor. Still not sure hand held action shots provide enough quality to allow a distinction to be made between Leica, Nikon and Canon prints. Thanks for sharing the nice shots.