Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Zeissleica@aol.com
From: kabob@tiac.net (Bob Keene/Karen Shehade)
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 20:40:07 -0400

Hi Mitch-

I'm a wedding photographer, and do alot with an M6, 35 Summilux, and Canon
50/1.4 LTM with adapter on the  M6. I shoot (in the church) Delta 3200
rated at 1600 and have the lab process it as if shot at 3200 (NO PULL- the
negs will be too thin!) Alot of the time I'm shooting around 1/15th-1/30th
1.4-2 (I gotta cut down on the coffee!) but they come out! I also will
sometimes use a Bogen monopod (the one with the bottom that unscrews and
becomes a psuedo-tripod; has a foot assembly) I have a small ball head and
a Stroboframe Quick release on the M6.... it can help and is amazingly
portable. (I'm also shooting a Hasselblad with a Justrite bracket and
Q-Flash- the Hassy has a Stroboframe QR plate on it so I can pop it onto
the mono/tri-pod too- then I shoot Kodak PMZ 1000- and can hand hold the
M6)

Whew-

went on much longer than I meant to....

have fun!

Bob Keene

>----------------
>
>Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 21:00:06 EDT
>From: Zeissleica@aol.com
>Subject: Zeissleica@aol.com
>
>Hi all...
>
>Now that I have my M3 kit back and fully operational, I've been shooting like
>mad and having a ball in the process.  I'm trying to capture one legit shot
>per day, but am finding it somewhat difficult, though it is getting me back
>in the habit of looking at everything as a possible composition.
>
>Having not exposed any interesting film stock since I was in college (a
>1,000,000+ frames of dupe film and a couple hundred rolls of regular Kodak
>Gold print film since then don't count), I am experimenting with any stock
>that catches my fancy.
>
>That said, my family is getting in on the game now and are making desires
>known; chief among them, my brother and his fiance want me to shoot B&W
>available light, informal, candid, handheld photographs (no tripods) at their
>wedding in November (they will have a professional shooting color for the
>formal stuff).  They know the results will be "artsy", but that's what they
>want.  I visited the church with them last week to take some meter readings
>and test shots.
>
>So far, I have tried HP5 (at EI 400) and Delta 3200 (at EI 3200).  The HP5
>looks real good but is too slow for this particular environment; the Delta
>3200 is scary fast but hideously grainy at 3200 (both were shot wide open
>with my Noct).  Readings are perfect for EI 800 at 1.0/250 to 1.0/125.
>
>My question is thus:
>
>Is the Delta 3200 (EI 800) significantly better to justify trying it (I
>haven't shot it at that speed yet)?  Or should I look into another film stock
>altogether?  The EI 3200 exposures are just too contrasty and grainy for me
>to use.
>
>BTW, according to the tests I've done so far...
>
>- - Royal Gold 100 is okay
>- - Portra 160VC is better
>- - Velvia 50 (shot at EI 40) is awesome, stunning and superlative (WOW!)
>
>I'm planning on getting the best of the bunch up on the Web within the next
>couple of weeks.
>
>/Mitch
>
>------------------------------