Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dick, The problem with your Viso sounds different to the problem I had. The release lever of my Viso appeared to work fine when the Viso was not mounted on the camera - it was just that the point at which the lever was tripping the mirror was so late in its travel that it couldn't travel far enough to trip the mirror when mounted on the camera - only when not on the camera. Your problem sounds to be to do with the interface between the lever mechanism and the mirror itself. On the Viso III the lever mechanism is concealed behind a removable cover on the side of the main mirror box and is thus easily accessible - from what I can see from pictures of the Viso II there isn't the same easy access to the lever mechanism, though I may be wrong. On the Viso III the lever mechanism is for controlling the choice of mirror lock-up, instant spring loaded mirror lift or quiet manual mirror lift. The job of lifting the mirror itself is very simple - a lever (the result of the release mechanism's motions) simply pushes on another lever which lifts the mirror. If the Viso II is basically similar to the Viso III then I imagine that this is where yours has the problem. It's such a simple mechanical system that it ought to be pretty simple to repair - but if you do open it up watch out for flying springs! I'm sure there must be someone else on the LUG who can give you a much better answer than this - I would go for a Viso III because of the extra features, but the Viso II is nice and compact. Good luck, Simon. Dick Baznik wrote: >Simon: > >I have (on approval) a Viso II which has a similar problem: depressing the >arm that links to the shutter release does not lift the mirror. I can lift >it manually (or "digitally," I presume, since I have to poke it up with my >fingertip), but the control lever will not raise it either. > >Recognizing that the mirror release for the II differs from that of the >III, do you think the problem with this one could be related to the problem >you fixed on yours? I am reluctant to disassemble a device that I do not >yet own. > >Advice welcome. Thanks.///Dick Baznik >__________ >